RR wanted to write to some Justices, provide a Judicial Notice, believing that a change is possible in appearing before Justices who are unaware of these matters relating to RR. It seems that even this is not possible, as the Senior Justices or the Political malicia, have now informed the Justices where RR was appearing for the first time, are also ignoring RR.

RR was baffled beyond comprehension, when he appeared before Justice Lyster on August 31, 2023 for the first time. This was a matter in which RR was assisting his friend, someone who had difficulty speaking in Court due to a speech impediment, and was partially blind in one eye. RR was not in the style of cause, but simply going to be the voice for his friend. In other words, RR was not litigating and being a good samaritan. 

Even before RR could say much, Justice Lyster prevented RR from speaking. 

Of course, the friend of RR was not represented. The law firm on the opposing side was Lawson Lundell, LLP, the same firm that was involved in the illegal transfer of property that belonged to RR as the only shareholder, where RR funds held in Court were stolen. This is the same law firm that deceived the former brother of RR. The deception is sophisticated and needs to be understood and explained by a good and honest lawyer. These recent experiences, initially unaware of the fact that Lawson Lundell was on the opposing side in the tenancy matter, RR realized the Modus Operandi of the crimes in Court, actually involved some Justices, where senior Justices pass on misinformation to other Justices.

The reason for preventing RR to speak, was the fear that the fraud of Lawson Lundell, LLP would be exposed, another scam being exposed, and the Justices involved would in turn be exposed. 

Any lawyer who attempts to defend this fraud of lawyers, is an; “accessory after the fact”:

 23 (1) An accessory after the fact to an offence is one who, knowing that a person has been a party to the offence, receives, comforts, or assists that person for the purpose of enabling that person to escape. 

For example, a sheriff who knows that a crime has occurred in Court by Officers of the Court, is an accessory to the fact. The corporate funds of RR have gone missing from the Trust accounts of the Supreme Court. The Vancouver staff and the Sheriff’s have not investigated the missing funds of $241,000. The lawyers and Justices are acting as if these funds belong to them after taking control of the business of RR. Perhaps now, the protest groups will understand the reason for RR talking about the fake water tank built without pipes. It is all about fraud,and crimes in British Columbia.

For the Benefit of Justice Lyster: Justice Lyster may be unaware of the crimes of Lawson Lundell, LLP. She may even be unaware of the misconduct of the senior Justices. She may be simply acting out of deference. However, if she is aware of the crime or deception of lawyers taking place, that Justice is in a conflict of interest and should have removed herself from the matter.

So the reasons for preventing RR speaking in Court may be considerable, but when RR was the voice of his friend, not in the style of cause, not involved in the litigation, that Justice had no right to say, “Mr Randhawa you are not a lawyer”. RR has never represented himself as a lawyer, but as an Agent. RR can help whoever he pleases. 

Then, Justice Lyster went on to say, “I will not let you speak or have an audience”, or something similar. Then, she asked me a question. In a Court which is dysfunctional, nothing is rational, and nothing is reasonable. 

The Sheriff who was in Court, must have made a report of this madness!

Now, this matter involving a friend of RR, is now in the Court of Appeal before Justice Horsemen. Another scam of lawyers is about to be exposed. An amended Petition has been filed. A number of lawyers are working very hard to conceal the scams. A number of Justices will likely be involved in covering up another scam. This is precisely the reason that RR could not get Justice. BC has become a lawless society.

For RR to resolve his matters a Judicial Notice is being sent to seven (7) compromised or corrupt Justices for them to correct the crimes, and dishonourably remove themselves from the Court. 

The crimes are by lawyers and Justices, and Institutions that are infiltrated, and dysfunctional. 

RR has issues to resolve with his family where these corrupt lawyers and Justice cannot be involved.

FINAL ATTEMPTS BY RR:

RR plans to make one final attempt to reach out to some Supreme Court Justices who have a sound mind. That Justice cannot behave like Justice Lyster, who acted irrational and now is a subject of a Judicial Complaint.

Judicial Immunity only exists for Judicial Acts. It is really simple. If a Justice was involved in theft, would that Justice be appointed as a Judge.

For those Justices who are unaware of the RR matters, be cautious. In being misinformed by corrupt Justices, refer to vicarious liability.

MODUS OPERANDI

The modus operandi is being stated here for the RCMP and Municipal Police of the crimes being committed in the Courts. Of course, for those learned individuals, modus operandi is a latin phrase meaning “mode of operating”: In criminal law, modus operandi refers to a method of operation or pattern of criminal behaviour so distinctive that separate crimes or wrongful conduct are recognized as the work of the same person. 

– Justices continually refusing to hear RR, is the modus operandi for concealing the crimes that are known to the Justices.

– A Court is where documents are filed, like affidavits. In the Court, preventing legal documents from being filed, so victims cannot achieve Justice, or correct the injustices of Justices, preventing facts being presented, is part of the modus operandi. 

– Outside of the Court, lawyers who acted for RR, walking away and not representing RR (for various unlawful reasons) is part of the modus operandi. 

– In having family criminally entrapped, through deception, unlawful acts of lawyers, is the modus operandi for lawyers to cause further harm to the victims from family members.

Perhaps the following paragraph will assist lawyers and Justices to do right.

Question of Reason: If those who are involved in crimes are permitted to freely enter the Courts; those who are victims are prevented from entering and speaking, then the Canadian Courts are not courts of law. The very reason for the Clear and Present Danger Notice being issued.

Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on the First Amendment, on freedoms of speech, press, or assembly. 

The test was replaced in 1969 with Brandenburg v Ohio’s on the imminent lawless action test. This test, or an equivalent law, applies to Canada or any democracy. Simply put, Justices cannot prevent victims from entering the Court to speak what is permitted under Absolute Privilege. In closing, may God save this Land from the tranny and madness!