Case Law For Systematic Racism
Fairness and adherence to the law:
It is crucial that the legal process is fair, ensuring that everyone involved follows the established laws and regulations.
Proper adjudication and reasonableness:
Cases should be handled through a proper judicial process, where decisions are made based on reasonable standards and principles.
Absence of malfeasance and conflict of interest:
It is essential to avoid any wrongdoing or unethical behavior, including conflicts of interest, among those responsible for upholding the law.
Access to Justice and correction of wrongs:
Individuals should have the ability to access the justice system easily and promptly, allowing for the resolution of any injustices they have experienced.
Legal precedence and lawful case law:
Precedents set by previous legal cases and the development of lawful case law play a significant role in guiding future decisions and ensuring consistency within the legal system that is required to be lawful.
RR truly wants to correct the legal system which is not a Justice System at present, where even the Justices are unaware of the reality of what is taking place. The truth of which will only be possible when RR is permitted to enter the Court.
Each one of these Justices has committed crimes. All of these Justices rely on their ability to say, “Mr. Randhawa you are vexatious” to avoid accepting the TRUTH. They rely on their ability to call the Sheriff’s to have a victim of crimes be walked out whilst those lawyers sit in Court involved in crimes.
There has been, over some time, considerable discussion and debate about “Access to Justice” and “Justice reform”. These combinations of words appear mostly by those who have been harmed by a legal system. In Canada, the legal system has been abused and manipulated extensively. Those who abuse the law do not desire free access to Justice nor desire Justice reform for victims. A thief who has stolen funds will not want access to Justice for the victim, and certainly, a Justice who has wronged will commit further intentional wrongs whilst expecting to be referred to as being, “honorable”.
But note, physically blocking a litigant from entering or Justices abusing the rules is “Obstruction of Justice”. This is precisely what RR stated before Justice Lyster on August 31, 2023 who simply assumed that RR was “declared vexatious” when the facts were not known to her. She and other Justices need to accept the fact that RR is a victim of multiple crimes for two decades.
When the legal system of any country has failed, or where the law is abused, the legal process manipulated, then democracy is severely affected and altered. Thus, a situation occurs, where victims begin to describe the actual circumstances and start discussing democracy, or describing it as being something else.
Any Justice without a conscience, immoral, under a conflict of interest, or involved in crimes, must never be a Justice.
Each one of these “Explanatory Words” is used by victims to describe what the victims are going through and where the legal system has failed. These victims end up going to Court and describing the situation to Justices for proper adjudication, of course, believing that the Judge is someone who cares about Justice. When a justice of the Supreme Court is compromised, a victim presenting facts, or describing the situation, is futile. One may as well be talking to the wall or a “twit” who has absolutely no comprehension of what is right or wrong.
For the above explanation, in the RR matters, the word used is “stupocracy”. A situation where an engineering regulatory body (APEGBC or EGBC), or a Justice of the Supreme Court, will want to believe or accept that a water tank can be commissioned without inlet and outlet pipes. This is a stupid situation.
Of course, RR is not naive, he realizes that Justices playing stupid is actually an unjustified defense to conceal their crimes and dismiss the Truth.
The Truth will always prevail, and it is known to the regulatory body, numerous Justices of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and various Institutions. The crimes are taking place by the engineering regulatory body, in a Nation that is supposed to stand for human rights, so this inhumane crime must be concealed.
Another way for litigants deprived of Justice to achieve it; is to take the lead, where another victim openly declares the reality, or the truth, in presenting case laws in their legal matters as case law or legal authorities. Thus, exposing the crimes of the judiciary and the corrupt Canadian Institutions. Victims who know the truth will have to give permission for open disclosure so other victims can use that material in Court.
The above can be achieved in the form of a written statement given by a victim as shown below:
I, (name of victim), declare that all legal cases involving me as a defendant, action numbers (list action numbers) are case law for “systemic institutional crimes and systematic racism”. These crimes involve (name of the Institution(s)), and the lawyers, law firms, and many officers of the Court (or the judiciary), who have committed crimes or aided and abetted, against me (and the victim’s family, if relevant).
A Justice, when asked by RR, “How do you fill a water tank without pipes?”, will remain silent.
The idea of implicating family members of victims and playing with the honor is a temporary delay and obstruction of Justice by the corrupt.
It is important to realize that when CRA has stolen income or property, the victim of this crime is owed considerable damages after what was stolen is returned. This is an important message to those lenders who are reluctant to lend funds to victims. It is time to ignore corrupt lawyers and listen to victims.
Finally, many regulatory bodies, justices of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, and various institutions are aware of the crimes being committed by the engineering regulatory body. The motive behind these crimes is to protect the wrongdoers, but always remember that the truth will always prevail.