Fake Structure - APEGBC Fraud

This RR matter relating to the alleged water tank collapse is a historical matter that will be dealt with when in Canada we have a Court of Law in British Columbia. It is not the case that many lawyers in Surrey, or Vancouver, B.C. do not know about these crimes against RR, as they are fully aware.
 

The typical advice offered by most victims from lawyers mostly is stated below:

“If you believe you have been a victim of fraud or misconduct, I would recommend seeking professional legal advice from a qualified attorney who can provide guidance based on the specific details of your case. They will be able to assess the situation, evaluate any evidence you may have, and advise you on the best course of action”

These individuals giving the advice will not say correctly, that “most lawyers in B.C. will not assist you, as they are cowards, or corrupt, and do not want to be victims of the same corrupt system”. 
 
RR considers that most lawyers do not have a mental disability and would know that, “a water tank without pipes cannot be put into operation, and cannot be commissioned”. However, RR will say based on his experience with lawyers, that the Intelligence Quotient (I.Q) of lawyers giving this advice is around 84,
 
The RR matter is a Canadian saga. 
 
A complete and detailed account will be provided to the corrupt Justices of the Supreme Court and compromised Politicians. But, for the public, do take time to read on, a summary of the events leading to the discovery of a Fake structure.
 
In April 2005, RR was investigated for the collapse of a water tank. RR was the Professional Engineer for a Design and Build firm, by the name of, Blue Water Systems Limited. The retainer for this project was limited in accepting an existing design of a proprietary structural system, a water storage tank. That water tank shown on the drawings had water pipes, when in fact, the structure built had no inlet, outlet, and overflow pipes. 
 

The pipes not being installed were not disclosed. When these missing pipes became evident in the hearings, the issue of missing pipes was simply disregarded.

RR was presented with signed and sealed drawings of another professional Engineer who had passed away. As this was an existing proprietary system with a proven track record, it meant that the system has been utilized successfully, without any collapses.

A concept review would have been completed by the previous professional engineer, of an existing proven system. An additional concept review was not required, but it was completed by RR. 

 
Of course, the entire matter relating to concept reviews is not understood by APEGBC, nor by some professional engineers. A lawyer, who is not an engineer, will take the words, “Concept Review”, and speak on such matters, whilst violating laws, and ethics, without understanding concept reviews. These lawyers simply have the privilege to speak utter nonsense, before corrupt, compromised, or unconcerned Justices who simply do not care. 

Any structural system, even a proprietary system, with a proven track record, can be optimized. The structure that is accepted by a P.Eng cannot be altered from the drawings that are sealed. This is not something that RR has to explain to the Regulatory body, nor explain to the Supreme Court Justices, or Politicians.

The RR retainer included optimizing the radial bands that surrounded the alleged water tank, on the assumption that the same said water tank that was optimized would be built, and that full disclosure was made by the client to RR. Thus, the retainer was making an existing water tank system more efficient.

The discipline panel of three (3) professional engineers, essentially determined that the water tank had been poorly designed, and this was the reason for the collapse. Thus, this water tank which is a proprietary system meant that numerous water tanks of a similar design built before should then be investigated, where public safety is compromised. Of course, those other water tank installations involved other professional engineers.

An Order condemning other water tanks of similar design, that were built, was not issued by the discipline panel, nor was any investigation done against other professional engineers. Therefore, other professional engineers who supposedly made mistakes or who did not understand engineering, are not regulated.

Many professionals who were involved in the discipline process, including witnesses, adjusters, lawyers, insurance agents, and many others, did not order a counter-expert opinion report to defend the position of RR. 

 

None of the above individuals, professionals, said, “God damn it, there are no water pipes going into the water tank, so it cannot be a water tank!”.

The fact that the alleged water tank had no pipes to fill or empty it, was known and not considered relevant by the regulatory body.

The expert report from Westmar Consultants Inc, which was submitted as part of the regulatory complaint against RR, had in excess of fifty-one (51) engineering errors. These engineering errors were stringently defended by Mr. Robert Hunter, LLB of Bull Housser and Tupper LLP. A lawyer who dismissed engineering, who was aware of the fraud, or some wrongdoing, and continued on and was, therefore, involved in criminal activity or acts of bad faith.

Further, that expert report from Westmar Consultants Inc, which was ridden with engineering errors, where the misconduct of Paul Hoo, P.E. was not relevant, was accepted by APEGBC and by the panel of three (3) professional engineers. The designation “P.E” is one that is used in the United States, in Canada the professional designation is, “P.Eng”. So, a professional engineer with a P.E designation was allowed to submit that report in British Columbia.

Designing a water tank and making reference to a Building Code, is utter nonsense, as a water tank is not a building. 

 
RR will presume in Canada, to design a building, APEGBC will consider it very professional to use a design code written for ships. Thus, the reader will understand the reason that RR use of the word, “stupocracy”.

The truth is, there was no water tank!

For the purposes of the regulatory investigation, a set-up of a professional engineer from the Sikh community was achieved in a FAKE Structure being constructed. As the investigation was of a water tank collapse, the “fake structure had to appear as a water tank”. 

 
This engineering fraud was done, with the expectation that the professional engineer will simply submit, give up, and accept the fraudulent determination. Those professional engineers within the organizations that are involved in crimes have continued to work and go to their families and possibly feel proud of being involved in racial acts, and involvement in crimes.
 
These Justices in the Supreme Court are not stupid. But, when educated, administrators with knowledge of the law, the so-called honorable, or individuals with responsibility, do stupid acts; for this reason, the Justices must be declared as being profoundly stupid for the much-needed change to be established, in Canada. 
 
These individuals who are corrupt or compromised, are not honorable. Nor does one reward, or offer respect, to Criminals. 
 

The entire Canadian society will eventually have no more faith and trust in Canada. Much will forever be lost. In fact, much has already been lost, and it is time to reclaim this Nation called Canada, from evil and demonic activity.

RR has reasoned enough and has been very reasonable until now. 

 

RR is known to many freedom fighters, so he would like to offer some advice to those who are fighting for change, and who claim to be awake. Learn to listen to good advice. You must not be divided through “petty differences in the pursuit of Justice”. These issues are not about religion. Reclaiming our fundamental rights is a constitutional right. So, stand firm with victims, regardless of race!

Let it be known, to all concerned, rather than investigate the serious misconduct and crimes of many professionals, especially, lawyers; RR was then subjected to tax fraud that was achieved involving the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA), and many other accountants and lawyers involved in this fraud. The end result, income, and property were stolen from RR, which must now be reclaimed with damages. 

 
The simplicity of these CRA crimes is discussed next, as it is not sophisticated fraud.